A useful structure#
Start with the task: “Compare these two drafts.” Add the constraint: “Keep the technical meaning.” Finish with the output: “Recommend one and explain why.” The structure helps you inspect the transcript without demanding scripted speech.
If you are correcting prior work, identify the part you want changed. “Shorten the second paragraph” is easier to place than “Make that bit better.” Read the latest task response so the referent is still clear.
Preserve the important distinctions#
A request for an analysis, a draft and an implementation grants different scope. Say which one you want. Include “do not send,” “do not publish” or “ask before purchasing” when those are actual constraints, then confirm that the negative wording survived transcription.
CueSpec’s reviewable draft supports this habit. It is not a guarantee that the agent will infer unstated limits. Optional semantic cleanup should organize what you said, not supply authority or facts you never gave. The final draft remains the request you are responsible for approving.